After MNCs Exit, Govt Wakes Up to Reduce the Taxes– But Economists Say Investor Trust is Very Hard to Regain
ISLAMABAD: Leading economists have sharply criticised the government’s belated move to slash or abolish super tax rates, saying the decision comes only after irreparable damage to investment and exports, caused by a narrow “accountancy mindset” rather than an economic one. The backlash intensified on social media after value investor Abdul Rehman Najam revealed that super tax rates are expected to be significantly reduced, with complete removal likely for exporters in the next budget. “After exit of multinationals, Govt is realising such high tax rates are back-breaking,” he posted, highlighting how effective tax rates nearing 50% on profits drove companies away. Former PTI economic spokesperson Muzzammil Aslam echoed the sentiment, stating: “This is the dilemma — we apply policy on the basis of accounting approach and ignore the economic approach. By the time investor decides to quit, it’s not easy to resume.” Economists argue the FBR’s obsession with short-term revenue collection blinded policymakers to long-term consequences. “You cannot tax growth to death and then act surprised when factories close and multinationals leave,” said one senior analyst. The recent exits of global giants, including Unilever, are cited as direct fallout of the super tax regime introduced in 2022. While some welcome the reported rollback as a step forward, most experts warn the harm — lost FDI, shuttered plants, and eroded investor confidence — cannot be quickly reversed. “Policy made by accountants destroys economies,” a Lahore-based economist remarked, summing up the widespread frustration now dominating economic discourse.









