Opinion

Hope on Four Wheels: Pakistan Auto Industry Posts Strongest Gains in Years Amid Economic Easing
Opinion

Hope on Four Wheels: Pakistan Auto Industry Posts Strongest Gains in Years Amid Economic Easing

Pakistan’s auto industry is finally showing signs of life after enduring two grueling years of stagnation, high interest rates, inflation, and supply disruptions. The latest data from the Pakistan Automotive Manufacturers Association (PAMA) for the first seven months of FY26 (July 2025–January 2026) paints an encouraging picture: passenger car sales reached 84,512 units, up a solid 45% from 58,385 units in the same period last year. Overall car sales (including LCVs, vans, and jeeps) climbed to around 111,368 units, marking a 43% year-on-year increase. January 2026 alone delivered a 43-month high with 23,055 units sold, underscoring that this isn’t a fleeting blip but a sustained rebound. Auto sector expert Mashood Ali Khan aptly describes it as a “clear turnaround.” Lower interest rates from the State Bank of Pakistan have been the single biggest catalyst—reviving auto financing, which is indeed the lifeline of this industry. When borrowing costs ease, monthly installments become manageable, and middle-class buyers return to showrooms. Khan’s projection that single-digit rates could push annual volumes toward 250,000 units is ambitious but not unrealistic if macroeconomic stability holds. Allied industries benefiting from improved economic activity have also boosted purchasing power, creating a virtuous cycle. Segment-wise, the trends are telling. Suzuki continues to dominate the small-car space with affordable, reliable models that urban buyers trust as entry-level vehicles. The SUV segment has turned fiercely competitive, with Japanese, Korean, and increasingly Chinese brands vying aggressively—good news for consumers seeking variety and potentially better value. Motorcycles, especially Honda’s lineup, are on fire, catering to the masses and poised to break records, highlighting two-wheelers’ role as the backbone of affordable mobility in Pakistan. Yet, this recovery remains fragile and uneven. Trucks and buses show only slight improvement, capped by sluggish construction and infrastructure activity—without a major public-sector push, this segment won’t reach its 15,000–20,000 unit potential. Tractors face even tougher headwinds from inconsistent government policies; the sector could easily hit 50,000–60,000 units annually with stable, long-term agricultural support instead of stop-start schemes. Khan rightly cautions that full recovery won’t be declared until volumes cross the 200,000-unit mark again, echoing historical highs of over 230,000 in FY2017-18 and FY2021-22. The current FY26 projection of 180,000–190,000 units signals steady progress but falls short of those peaks. Sustainability depends on three pillars: continued low interest rates, fiscal policy restraint (avoiding sudden taxes or duties that spike costs), and exchange rate stability to prevent imported component inflation. The deeper lesson here is structural. Pakistan’s auto sector has repeatedly underperformed its potential due to policy inconsistency—tariff flip-flops, localization delays, and short-term incentives that distort rather than build the market. A coherent industrialization strategy focused on localization (to reduce import dependence), SME integration (for parts and components), and export orientation could transform the industry from assembly-heavy to a genuine manufacturing hub. This rebound is welcome and overdue, but it’s not victory. It’s a window of opportunity. If policymakers prioritize long-term clarity over quick fixes, the auto sector could drive broader economic growth, job creation, and even export earnings. If not, we’ll be back to boom-bust cycles before long. The numbers are positive—now the policies must match them. The writer is an expert on auto and SMEs and Director of The Mehran Commercial

Safety Isn't a Burden—It's Survival: Why Gul Plaza & Baldia Remind Us of the Real Cost of Cutting Corners
Opinion

Safety Isn’t a Burden—It’s Survival: Why Gul Plaza & Baldia Remind Us of the Real Cost of Cutting Corners

Karachi: As rescue teams continue sifting through the smoldering ruins of Gul Plaza on M.A. Jinnah Road, the death toll has climbed to at least 14–19 people, with over 60 still missing and dozens injured. The massive fire, which erupted late Saturday night and raged for nearly 36 hours before being brought under control, has devastated a beloved multi-story shopping hub housing around 1,200 shops selling everything from garments and cosmetics to plastics and household goods. Read More: https://theboardroompk.com/karachis-gul-plaza-inferno-death-toll-hits-14-dozens-still-missing-after-36-hour-blaze/ Thick smoke trapped victims inside due to poor ventilation, blocked exits, and the rapid spread fueled by highly flammable stock. Officials suspect a faulty circuit breaker or electrical short circuit as the cause, with investigations ongoing amid reports of outdated wiring and inadequate safety measures. This heartbreaking scene echoes one of Pakistan’s darkest industrial tragedies: the 2012 Baldia Town factory fire at Ali Enterprises. That inferno claimed 259–289 lives (mostly workers trapped by locked exits, barred windows, and absent firefighting equipment) and injured hundreds more. The blaze, possibly sparked by a faulty generator or electrical fault, spread unchecked through garment and plastic materials in a building riddled with violations—unregistered workers, no fire drills, blocked escape routes, and zero sprinklers or alarms. Investigations revealed a pattern of negligence: safety compliance was skipped to cut costs in a competitive export-driven sector, turning a potential minor incident into mass fatalities from smoke inhalation, burns, and stampedes. In both cases, the mindset that fire safety or ever overall safety is a “financial burden” proved fatally wrong. Basic precautions—certified wiring checks, affordable ABC extinguishers (costing just a few thousand rupees), clear emergency exits, smoke detectors, ventilation improvements, and regular drills—were deemed too expensive or inconvenient. Yet the true price has been staggering: irreplaceable lives, billions in economic losses for traders and families, destroyed livelihoods, and long-term trauma for Karachi’s commercial heart. Gul Plaza’s collapse and Baldia’s locked doors highlight how short-term savings on safety lead to long-term ruin—human, financial, and communal. Traders and experts now stress that safety is an investment, not an expense. Small steps like installing MCBs, maintaining extinguishers, ensuring unobstructed pathways, and securing insurance could prevent repeats. Sindh authorities have announced compensation for victims’ families, but prevention demands stricter enforcement of building codes, mandatory audits, and a cultural shift among landlords, shop owners, and regulators. As Karachi mourns Gul Plaza’s victims—including a brave firefighter—and searches for the missing, the message is clear: treating safety as optional isn’t thrift—it’s recklessness. Survival demands we prioritize lives over ledgers. Never again should “too costly” become the excuse for preventable tragedy. Karachi’s markets deserve better; their people deserve safety first.

Pakistan’s FDI Trap: Why Foreign Money Is Making Us Richer Consumers, Not Stronger Producers, Exporters
Opinion

Pakistan’s FDI Trap: Why Foreign Money Is Making Us Richer Consumers, Not Stronger Producers, Exporters

By Dr Jazib Mumtaz Pakistan has pursued foreign investment for years, but the economic payoff has been disappointingly small. Factories are shutting down, exports are stagnant or declining, and the country continues to import far more than it produces or sells abroad. A recent study published in the Lahore Journal of Economics titled “Impact of Efficiency-Seeking FDI on the Economy” explains why. The real issue is not the volume of foreign money flowing in, but its nature. Most foreign investors come to Pakistan primarily to tap its large and growing domestic consumer market, not to build new factories or strengthen the country’s ability to manufacture and export. These investors concentrate in non-tradable or import-heavy sectors such as banking, telecommunications, retail chains, and consumer services. While these businesses can be profitable and create some jobs, they rely heavily on imported equipment, technology, and services. As they grow, they actually widen Pakistan’s trade deficit: more dollars leave the country than enter it. In effect, Pakistan becomes an attractive sales market for multinational corporations rather than a competitive global producer. The study contrasts this with “efficiency-seeking” foreign direct investment (FDI) focused on manufacturing sectors where Pakistan already has a foundation—textiles, food processing, metals, chemicals, engineering goods, and similar industries. When foreign firms bring advanced technology and management practices into these tradable sectors, the benefits spread widely: productivity rises, local suppliers upgrade, quality improves, exports grow, and import dependence falls. One improved factory can lift an entire value chain of farmers, component makers, workers, and supporting industries. The central conclusion is straightforward: Pakistan must become far more selective about the type of foreign investment it courts. Policy should prioritize projects that build production capacity, transfer technology, create skilled employment, and integrate local firms into global supply chains—rather than projects that simply sell imported or import-dependent goods and services to Pakistani consumers. Current incentives, regulations, and the overall business environment still favor the easier, quick-return consumer-market investments. Unless Pakistan deliberately shifts toward export-oriented, efficiency-enhancing FDI—through better-targeted incentives, lower input costs, transparent rules, and a level playing field between foreign and domestic firms—it will remain stuck in the same cycle: a growing market for foreign products, a shrinking industrial base, and a chronic balance-of-payments problem. Pakistan is at a critical juncture. It can continue expanding as a consumption-driven economy dependent on imports and foreign brands, or it can pivot to becoming a production and export hub powered by smart, productive foreign investment. The difference is not how much money comes in, but what that money is used for. The wrong kind of FDI keeps Pakistan dependent; the right kind helps Pakistan stand on its own. The choice, as the study makes clear, is now. Jazib Mumtaz is an applied economist and social scientist with a strong focus on welfare economics, income distribution, and trade policy research.

Scroll to Top