The Supreme Court of Pakistan has taken a significant step in the ongoing legal proceedings involving former Prime Minister Imran Khan.
While hearing appeals against the Toshakhana criminal trial, a two-member bench led by Chief Justice Yahya Afridi appointed Barrister Salman Safdar as amicus curiae (friend of the court).
This impartial advisor has been granted permission to visit Imran Khan at Adiala Jail in Rawalpindi.
The decision follows the court’s earlier rejection of an urgent plea by PTI lawyers for an immediate meeting with the incarcerated leader.
Court’s Directive and Purpose
The bench directed Safdar to assess Imran Khan’s current living conditions, health status, and the facilities provided in jail. He must submit a comprehensive written report on his findings.
Chief Justice Afridi instructed the attorney general to ensure no obstacles are placed in the way of the visit.
Safdar was told to contact the court directly if any hindrance arises from jail authorities.
The court also summoned a formal report from the jail superintendent to place all facts on record.
This move aims to verify the ground situation independently.
Background and Context
Imran Khan has been imprisoned since August 2023, facing multiple charges including corruption in the Toshakhana case, land fraud, and disclosure of official secrets.
Recent concerns have focused on his health, particularly a reported diagnosis of central retinal vein occlusion in his right eye, which medical experts described as serious and potentially vision-threatening if not treated promptly.
The appointment of Safdar comes amid ongoing debates over his detention conditions.
A prior report on his earlier stay in Attock Jail (August 2023) was noted, but the court deemed a fresh, on-site assessment necessary.
Reactions and Next Steps
Barrister Safdar confirmed to the media that his visit was scheduled for 2:00 pm on the same day, describing it as a “heavy responsibility” assigned by the court.
The Supreme Court adjourned the hearing until February 12, planning to review Safdar’s report before resuming proceedings.
This development highlights the judiciary’s role in ensuring transparency in high-profile incarceration cases.